- MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC HOW TO
- MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC UPDATE
- MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC CODE
- MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC SERIES
- MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC MAC
MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC MAC
The Mac is for those who “think different,” while the nature of iOS does not encourage that. There would be no iOS if not for the Mac. The Mac is the workhorse, used to really get things done and “go off road.” It’s the only platform it supports for writing both Mac and iOS apps. This, to me, embodies what I perceive to be Apple’s stance on macOS and iOS. He compared the Mac to a car, something that could be operated safely but that required caution, saying, “You can take it off road if you want, and you can drive wherever you want.” He said that an iOS device was something that anyone-even an infant-could operate safely.
If you still need convincing, just consider Federighi’s own words during his testimony. So, if it had plans to lock down macOS in the same way, why would it spend all that time, effort, and money on better supporting antivirus software? It doesn’t make sense.
MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC HOW TO
It did a great job of implementing something that was able to deliver what was requested, and it spent time bringing antivirus developers to Apple HQ to teach them how to use the new framework.Īntivirus software on iOS is impossible, due to Apple restrictions. It had conversations with security companies to find out what they needed.
If Apple’s intent were to shove all developers into the App Store, why would they spend time, effort, and money on an attempt to improve the user experience with apps distributed outside the App Store?Īnother point to consider is the EndpointSecurity framework. Its efficacy can be called into question, since many pieces of malware have managed to get a clean bill of health from the Notarization process, but that’s not the question here. First, consider Notarization, which is intended to curb distribution of malicious apps outside the App Store. However, this also isn’t indicated by Apple’s actions. By pointing out the weaknesses in macOS as a means for illustrating the security of iOS, some fear this is a sign that Apple intends to lock down the Mac in the same way that it has iOS. Others are taking Federighi’s words in a different light. Not all of the hot takes out there have to do with mocking Apple. In the end, this all boils down to mocking Apple for publicly acknowledging something it has been mocked for years for not acknowledging. It may not make a lot of public statements acknowledging the malware problem, but actions speak louder than words.
MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC UPDATE
It has also recently started adding information to its security update information disclosing when its aware of a fixed bug being actively exploited in the wild by malware.Īll this and more shows very clearly that Apple has been aware of the malware issue for a long time. This was essentially an official acknowledgement from Apple that Macs get malware, and that there is a need for third-party antivirus software for the Mac. (Ironically, there was a similar security feature in Windows that Apple mocked in another of the Get a Mac ads.) Admittedly, Apple really only talks about the privacy aspect of these restrictions, but the security aspect is pretty obvious.Īpple also implemented a new EndpointSecurity framework in macOS 10.15 (Catalina), in order to better support third-party antivirus software that-until then-was reliant on ageing, deprecated functionality provided by macOS.
MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC SERIES
(One could argue about the efficacy of these measures, but the intent is clear.)Īnother recent addition is a series of access restrictions that must be approved on a per-app basis, such as access to the Documents or Desktop folders.
It implemented Notarization requirements as a means of checking apps distributed outside the App Store for malware.
MALWAREBYTES REVIEW COMPARISON MAC CODE
It has implemented increasingly strict code signing requirements as a means for controlling some malware.
Apple’s actions over the last ten years speak volumes. On the contrary, we should not be surprised by this. Of course, these ads last played more than a decade ago, and things have changed significantly between then and now, so this isn’t exactly a sudden change of heart. The irony of this 180 degree turnaround has caused a huge amount of snide commentary.
0 kommentar(er)
